Albin and colleagues make the argument that interventions are more likely to be adopted and implemented if they is a good contextual fit between the context of implementation and the intervention.
Albin, R. W., Lucyshyn, L. M., Homer, R. H., & Flannery, K. B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavioral support plans: A model for A Goodness-of-fit. In R. L. K. L. K. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), (Ed.), Positiveb ehavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. (pp. 81-89).). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
Acceptability is a proxy measure of how well an intervention fits into the context of the intervention setting.
Allinder, R. M., & Oats, R. G. (1997). Effects of Acceptability on Teachers’ Implementation of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Student Achievement in Mathematics Computation. Remedial & Special Education, 18(2), 113. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&UID=1997-03796-005
Benazzi and colleagues examined the contextual fit of interventions when they were deveopled by different configurations of individuals.
Benazzi, L., Horner, R. H., & Good, R. H. (2006). Effects of Behavior Support Team Composition on the Technical Adequacy and Contextual Fit of Behavior Support Plans. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 160-170.
In this article is a proposed model for developing interventions so that they fit into the context of public schools.
Cappella, E., Reinke, W. M., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2011). Advancing Intervention Research in School Psychology: Finding the Balance Between Process and Outcome for Social and Behavioral Interventions. School Psychology Review, 40(4), 455-464.conte
The impact of an intervention is influenced by how well it fis into the context of a classroom. This paper suggests a number of variables to consider and how they might be measured prior to the development of an intervention.
Detrich, R. (1999). Increasing treatment fidelity by matching interventions to contextual variables within the educational setting. School Psychology Review, 28(4), 608-620.
This paper provides an integrated understanding of contextual factors that affect implementation.
Han, S. S., & Weiss, B. (2005). Sustainability of Teacher Implementation of School-Based Mental Health Programs. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(6), 665-679.
Implementation of an intervention always occurs in a specific context. This papers considers the complexity that context contributes to implementation science.
May, C. R., Johnson, M., & Finch, T. (2016). Implementation, context and complexity. Implementation Science, 11(1), 141.
This article provides an overview of contextual factors across the levels of an educational system that influence implementation.
Schaughency, E., & Ervin, R. (2006). Building Capacity to Implement and Sustain Effective Practices to Better Serve Children. School Psychology Review, 35(2), 155-166. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ788242
The paper describes the relationship between the three cornerstones of evidence-based practice including context.
Slocum, T. A., Detrich, R., Wilczynski, S. M., Spencer, T. D., Lewis, T., & Wolfe, K. (2014). The Evidence-based Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 37, 41-56.
Evidence-based practice is a decision-making framework. This paper describes the relationships among the three cornerstones of this framework.
Spencer, T. D., Detrich, R., & Slocum, T. A. (2012). Evidence-based Practice: A Framework for Making Effective Decisions. Education & Treatment of Children (West Virginia University Press), 35(2), 127-151.